Zero-knowledge proof platform
Cryptographic proof that every record in a population was evaluated — without exposing one. Thirteen proof services on a single engine, natively configured for regulators across the GCC, the EU, Switzerland and Singapore.
If you can define it as a rule, we can prove it without revealing the data.
Post-quantum proof infrastructure. Hash-based STARKs — no trusted setup, no ceremony, no shared secret to compromise.
The problem
An institution can always show you what it found. What it cannot show you is that it looked at everything — and that is the question a supervisor asks after a failure.
01
Reserves are provable, and 40 feeds already prove them. Which records were and were not evaluated is what nobody attests. That gap is where the failures happen — the reserves were intact throughout.
02
Completeness is evidenced today through internal audit and sampling-based independent testing. A sample says the process works. It does not say every record went through it, and the record that did not is the one that matters.
03
MiCA RTS 2025/885 Article 3(5) requires records including the reasons for submitting or not submitting a report — the analysis of everything, including what produced nothing. That is a completeness claim in the legislative text.
Our platform
Filter
If you can define it as a rule, we can prove it without revealing the data.
| Nº | Service | Family | For | Frameworks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Sanctions Screening | Completeness | Banks · FIs · VASPs | OFAC · EU · UN · FATF |
| 02 | AML / KYC Rule Proof | Completeness | Banks · VASPs · Exchange houses | FATF · VARA · CBUAE · MAS · DNB |
| 03 | Travel Rule Compliance | Completeness | VASPs · Exchanges · Payment providers | FATF R.16 · MiCA · VARA · MAS |
| 04 | Market Abuse Surveillance | Completeness | CASPs · Trading platforms | MiCA ART. 92 · RTS 2025/885 |
| 05 | ESG / CSRD Emissions Proof | Completeness | Corporates · Sustainability teams | CSRD · ESRS |
| 06 | Proof of Solvency | Solvency | Exchanges · Custodians · Banks | VARA · CBUAE · DFSA · SAMA · MAS |
| 07 | Stablecoin Proof of Backing | Solvency | Stablecoin issuers · Reserve managers | MiCA ART. 36 · GENIUS · MAS SCS |
| 08 | VASP Counterparty Solvency | Solvency | VASPs · Counterparties | VARA · ADGM · MAS |
| 09 | Client Money Segregation | Solvency | Firms holding client assets | DFSA · ADGM · MAS · EU SAFEGUARDING |
| 10 | EU Pay Equity Proof | Gap | Employers · HR · Compensation teams | DIRECTIVE (EU) 2023/970 |
| 11 | Loan Covenant Monitoring | Threshold | Banks · Corporate borrowers · Lenders | CREDIT AGREEMENTS |
| 12 | Collateral Quality Proof | Threshold | Lenders · Prime brokers · Clearing houses | INTERNAL · BASEL |
| 13 | Vendor Qualification | Threshold | Procurement · Third-party risk | INTERNAL POLICY |
See a live proof
We bring the engine — you bring your team. One day, one proof, and you decide what comes next.
A worked example over SEC Form N-MFP3/A, accession 0001752724-25-156739 — a prime money market fund, 84 holdings, $146,772,393.03. The filing is public, so you can recompute every figure by hand and check ours against it.
The same book is in breach of one in-force limit and compliant under another, because different rules count repo differently. The threshold is a parameter; the family is the same.
What we guarantee
Not promises we make. Properties of the proof infrastructure that hold whether or not you trust us.
01
Producing a false proof that passes verification is computationally impossible — even for the institution that generated it. This is not a policy. It is a mathematical property. An auditor can be compromised. A proof cannot.
Mathematically enforced02
No customer record, transaction amount, balance, salary or proprietary data point appears in any proof bundle. The receiving party gets a mathematical proof, not a data file. Exposure is zero by construction.
Cryptographic guarantee03
The verifier requires no account, no licence and no contact with us. Any regulator, auditor or member of the public can verify independently and reach the same result. The proof is the authority, not the vendor.
Independent verification04
Resistant to both classical and quantum attack. No ceremony, no shared secrets, no single point of trust — nothing to compromise and nothing that must be destroyed afterwards.
No trusted setup required05
An insolvent book produces a verifiable proof of insolvency. A screening report containing matches proves. Where only good news can be proved, silence becomes the signal — and silence is what a party with something to hide supplies.
Verdict, not veto06
A single unevaluated record makes a completeness proof impossible to produce. Without that, an institution could omit exactly the customer it did not want checked and still hold a signed attestation.
Coverage enforcedHow it works
No sensitive data ever leaves your systems. The proof is generated where the data lives and verified independently by anyone.
01
You map your columns to the service schema in a desktop application that runs on your machine. Identities are tokenised locally with a key we never receive.
02
Every record is evaluated against the rule set named in the signed bundle. A skipped record is not silently dropped — it makes the proof impossible to produce.
03
The proof is produced from tokenised data. No balance, salary or identity enters it. Every stage is signed, so tampering between stages is detectable.
04
The recipient runs a standalone verifier. No account, no network call, no contact with us — so the result does not depend on our being honest, or on our being online.
Get started
One service, your data, your infrastructure. You keep the proofs whatever you decide afterwards.
One day. One proof. You decide what comes next.
